4.7 Article

Atmospheric turbulence induced errors on measurements of surface temperature from space

Journal

REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT
Volume 168, Issue -, Pages 40-53

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2015.06.018

Keywords

Thermal infrared; Land surface temperature; Accuracy; Thermal remote sensing; Atmospheric turbulence; Temperature fluctuations; Spatial resolution

Funding

  1. Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales (CNES) through the TOSCA (Terre, Ocean, Surfaces Continentales, Atmosphere) committee

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Atmospheric turbulence in both surface (SBL) and planetary (PBL) boundary-layers induce temporal fluctuations of surface temperature (T-s), with potentially important resulting errors on instantaneous satellite measurements in the thermal infrared (TIR). Several experimental studies have been performed over different surfaces (pine forest, maize, bare soil) using TIR cameras, either ground based or helicopter borne, designed to evaluate (i) how the spatial resolution operates a smoothing of the temporal fluctuations of the surface temperature measurements from space, and (ii) the resulting uncertainty on these measurements. Additionally, a simulation of instantaneous surface temperatures of a maritime pine stand, performed using a Large Eddy Simulation (LES) airflow model coupled with a canopy model, is presented for comparison. The results confirm that the impact of the SBL turbulence rapidly vanishes when spatial resolution decreases (i.e., pixel size increases) in the range of 50 to 100 m, while T-s fluctuations induced by the low frequency PBL turbulence remain. For these resolutions, the resulting uncertainty on T-s lies within a +/- 1 degrees C interval. The implications for designing the specifications of future high spatial resolution TIR missions, in particular NeDT and revisit are discussed. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available