4.5 Article

Optimal Design of Multiple-Channel RF Pulses Under Strict Power and SAR Constraints

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 63, Issue 5, Pages 1280-1291

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22330

Keywords

parallel transmission; pulse design; RF safety; transmit array; Transmit SENSE; B1 non-uniformity; ultra-high-field MRI

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [200021-16400]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Parallel radio frequency transmission has recently been explored as a means of tailoring the spatial response of MR excitation. In particular, parallel transmission is increasingly used to accelerate radio frequency pulses that rely on time-varying gradient fields to achieve selectivity in multiple dimensions. The design of the underlying multiple-channel radio frequency waveforms is mostly based on regularized least-squares optimization in close analogy with image reconstruction in parallel imaging. However, this analogy has important limitations. Unlike image reconstruction, the design of radio frequency waveforms is subject to multiple strict constraints, which arise from technical power limits, as well as safety limits on local and global energy deposition in vivo. To optimize excitation profiles under such strict constraints, it is proposed to depart from the regularization strategy and rely on semidefinite programming instead. To render this approach fast, it is performed in a reduced search space, which is obtained by initial Lanczos iteration. The proposed algorithm is demonstrated to enable efficient pulse optimization within exactly the given constraints, including local specific absorption rate limits for multiple compartments. It is also shown that the proposed approach readily accommodates advanced forward models of the excitation process, including the effects of local off-resonance and transverse relaxation. Magn Reson Med 63:1280-1291, 2010. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available