4.5 Article

An Automated Method for Nonparametric Kinetic Analysis of Clinical DCE-MRI Data: Application to Glioblastoma Treated with Bevacizumab

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 63, Issue 5, Pages 1366-1375

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22335

Keywords

nonparametric model; pharmacokinetics; MRI; bevacizumab; impulse response function

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Here, we describe an automated nonparametric method for evaluating gadolinium-diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid (GdDTPA) kinetics, based on dynamic contrast-enhanced-MRI scans of glioblastoma patients taken before and after treatment with bevacizumab; no specific model or equation structure is assumed or used. Tumor and venous blood concentration-time profiles are smoothed, using a robust algorithm that removes artifacts due to patient motion, and then deconvolved, yielding an impulse response function. In addition to smoothing, robustness of the deconvolution operation is assured by excluding data that occur prior to the plasma peak; an exhaustive analysis was performed to demonstrate that exclusion of the prepeak plasma data does not significantly affect results. All analysis steps are executed by a single R script that requires blood and tumor curves as the sole input. Statistical moment analysis of the Impulse response function yields the area under the curve (AUC) and mean residence time (MRT). Comparison of deconvolution results to fitted Tofts model parameters suggests that AUC/MRT and AUC of the Impulse response functions closely approximate fractional clearance from plasma to tissue (K-trans) and fractional interstitial volume (v(e)). Intervisit variability is shown to be comparable when using the deconvolution method (11%[AUC/MRT] and 13%[AUC]) compared to the Tofts model (14%[K-trans] and 24%[v(e)]). AUC and AUC/MRT both exhibit a statistically significant decrease (P < 0.005) 1 day after administration of bevacizumab. Magn Reson Med 63:1366-1375, 2010. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available