4.5 Article

Modified Pulsed Continuous Arterial Spin Labeling for Labeling of a Single Artery

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 64, Issue 4, Pages 975-982

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22363

Keywords

continuous arterial spin labeling; cerebral perfusion; magnetic resonance imaging; perfusion territory imaging; selective arterial labeling

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [AG027435, CA115745, MH080729]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Imaging the contribution of different arterial vessels to the blood supply of the brain can potentially guide the treatment of vascular disease and other disorders. Previously available only with catheter angiography, vessel-selective labeling of arteries has now been demonstrated with pulsed and continuous arterial spin labeling methods. Pulsed continuous labeling, which permits continuous labeling on standard scanner radiofrequency hardware, has been used to encode the contribution of different vessels to the blood supply of the brain. Vessel encoding requires a longer scan and a more complex reconstruction algorithm and may be more sensitive to fluctuations in flow, however. Here a method is presented for single-artery selective labeling, in which a disk around the targeted vessel is labeled. Based on pulsed continuous labeling, this method is achieved by rotating the directions of added in-plane gradients. Numerical simulations of the simplest strategy show good efficiency but poor suppression of labeling at large distances from the target vessel. Amplitude modulation of the rotating in-plane gradients results in better suppression of distant vessels. In vivo results demonstrate highly selective labeling of individual vessels and a rapid fall-off of the labeling with distance from the center of the labeling disk, in agreement with the simulations. Magn Reson Med 64:975-982, 2010. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available