4.5 Article

A Novel Method for Quantifying Scanner Instability in fMRI

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 65, Issue 4, Pages 1053-1061

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22691

Keywords

quality assurance; fMRI; multisite; scanner instability

Funding

  1. National Center for Research Resources [P41-RR14075, R01 RR16594, P41-009874, BIRN002]
  2. National Center for Research Resources (Functional Imaging Biomedical Informatics Research Network (FBIRN) [U24 RR021382]
  3. National Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering [R01 EB001550, R01EB006758]
  4. Department of Energy [DE-F02-99ER62764-A012]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A method was developed to quantify the effect of scanner instability on functional MRI data by comparing the instability noise to endogenous noise present when scanning a human. The instability noise was computed from agar phantom data collected with two flip angles, allowing for a separation of the instability from the background noise. This method was used on human data collected at four 3 T scanners, allowing the physiological noise level to be extracted from the data. In a well-operating scanner, the instability noise is generally less than 10% of physiological noise in white matter and only about 2% of physiological noise in cortex. This indicates that instability in a well-operating scanner adds very little noise to functional MRI results. This new method allows researchers to make informed decisions about the maximum instability level a scanner can have before it is taken off line for maintenance or rejected from a multisite consortium. This method also provides information about the background noise, which is generally larger in magnitude than the instability noise. Magn Reson Med 65:1053-1061, 2011. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available