4.7 Article

Strengths and weaknesses of multi-year Envisat ASAR backscatter measurements to map permanent open water bodies at global scale

Journal

REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT
Volume 171, Issue -, Pages 185-201

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2015.10.031

Keywords

Water body; SAR; Backscatter; Envisat ASAR; C-band; Land cover

Funding

  1. European Space Agency (ESA) (ESRIN) [4000101774/10/I-LG]
  2. Project G-POD processing of ASAR Wide Swath imagery for multipurpose applications [9209]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mapping of water bodies at global scale has been undertaken primarily using multi-spectral optical Earth Observation data. Limitations of optical data associated with non-uniform and temporally variable spectral signatures suggested investigating alternative approaches towards a more consistent and reliable detection of water bodies. Multi-year (2005-2012) observations of SAR backscattered intensities at moderate resolution from the Envisat Advanced Synthetic Aperture Radar (ASAR) instrument were used in this study to generate an indicator of open permanent water bodies (SAR-WBI) for the year 2010 time frame and for all land surfaces excluding Antarctica and the Greenland ice sheet A first map of potential water bodies with a spatial resolution of 150 m was obtained with a global detection algorithm based on a set of thresholds applied to multi-temporal metrics of the SAR backscatter (temporal variability, TV, and minimum backscatter, MB). Local refinements were then used to reduce systematic commission and omission errors (4.6% of the total area mapped) due to the similarity of TV and MB over open water bodies and other land surface types primarily in cold and arid environments. The refinement rules are here explained by means of a detailed signature analysis of the SAR backscatter in such environments. The accuracy of the SAR-WBI was 80% when compared against 2078 manually interpreted footprints with a size of 150 x 150 m(2). Omission errors were primarily observed along coast- and shorelines whereas commission errors were associated with (i) ephemeral water bodies, (ii) seasonally inundated areas, and (iii) an incorrect choice of the local refinement. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available