4.5 Article

Automatic Quality Assessment in Structural Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 62, Issue 2, Pages 365-372

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21992

Keywords

magnetic resonance imaging; automatic quality assessment; image quality; artifact detection

Funding

  1. National Institute on Aging
  2. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

MRI has evolved into an important diagnostic technique in medical imaging. However, reliability of the derived diagnosis can be degraded by artifacts, which challenge both radiologists and automatic computer-aided diagnosis. This work proposes a fully-automatic method for measuring image quality of three-dimensional (3D) structural MRI. Quality measures are derived by analyzing the air background of magnitude images and are capable of detecting image degradation from several sources, including bulk motion, residual magnetization from incomplete spoiling, blurring, and ghosting. The method has been validated 14 on 749 3D T-1-weighted 1.5T and 3T head scans acquired at 36 Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) study sites operating with various software and hardware combinations. Results are compared against qualitative grades assigned by the ADNI quality control center (taken as the reference standard). The derived quality indices are independent of the MRI system used and agree with the reference standard quality ratings with high sensitivity and specificity (>85%). The proposed procedures for quality assessment could be of great value for both research and routine clinical imaging. It could greatly improve workflow through its ability to rule out the need for a repeat scan while the patient is still in the magnet bore. Magn Reson Med 62:365-372, 2009. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available