4.5 Article

Prospective Real-Time Correction for Arbitrary Head Motion Using Active Markers

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 62, Issue 4, Pages 943-954

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22082

Keywords

motion correction; prospective; real-time; active marker; device tracking; RF-coil; microcoil; rigid-body; motion artifact

Funding

  1. NIBIB NIH HHS [R21 EB006877, R21EB006877, R21 EB006877-02, R21 EB006877-01A2] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Patient motion during an MRI exam ran result in major degradation of image quality, and is of increasing concern due to the aging population and its associated diseases. This work presents a general strategy for real-time, intraimage compensation of rigid-body motion that is compatible with multiple imaging sequences. Image quality improvements are established for structural brain MRI acquired during volunteer motion. A headband integrated with three active markers is secured to the forehead. Prospective correction is achieved by interleaving a rapid track-and-update module into the imaging sequence. For every repetition of this module, a short tracking pulse-sequence remeasures the marker positions; during head motion, the rigid-body transformation that realigns the markers to their initial positions is fed back to adaptively update the image-plane-maintaining it at a fixed orientation relative to the head-before the next imaging segment of k-space is acquired. In cases of extreme motion, corrupted lines of k-space are rejected and reacquired with the updated geometry. High-precision tracking measurements (0.01 mm) and corrections are accomplished in a temporal resolution (37 ms) suitable for real-time application. The correction package requires minimal additional hardware and is fully integrated into the standard user interface, promoting transferability to clinical practice. Magn Reson Med 62:943-954, 2009. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available