4.5 Article

Optimal k-Space Sampling for Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI with an Application to MR Renography

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 61, Issue 5, Pages 1242-1248

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21901

Keywords

time-resolved MRI; dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI; MR renography; optimal sampling; TWIST

Funding

  1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
  2. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01 DK063183, R01 DK067523]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For time-resolved acquisitions with k-space undersampling, a simulation method was developed for selecting imaging parameters based on minimization of errors in signal intensity versus time and physiologic parameters derived from tracer kinetic analysis. Optimization was performed for time-resolved angiography with stochastic trajectories (TWIST) algorithm applied to contrast-enhanced MR renography. A realistic 4D phantom comprised of aorta and two kidneys, one healthy and one diseased, was created with ideal tissue time-enhancement pattern generated using a three-compartment model with fixed parameters, including glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and renal plasma flow (RPF). TWIST acquisitions with different combinations of sampled central and peripheral k-space portions were applied to this phantom. Acquisition performance was assessed by the difference between simulated signal intensity (SI) and calculated GFR and RPF and their ideal values. Sampling of the 20% of the center and 1/5 of the periphery of k-space in phase-encoding plane and data-sharing of the remaining 4/5 minimized the errors in SI (<5%), RPF, and GFR (both <10% for both healthy and diseased kidneys). High-quality dynamic human images were acquired with optimal TWIST parameters and 2.4 sec temporal resolution. The proposed method can be generalized to other dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI applications, e.g., MR angiography or cancer imaging. Magn Reson Med 61:1242-1248, 2009. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available