4.5 Article

Performance of a miniature high-temperature superconducting (HTS) surface coil for in vivo microimaging of the mouse in a standard 1.5T clinical whole-body scanner

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 60, Issue 4, Pages 917-927

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21605

Keywords

MR microscopy; high-temperature superconductor (HTS); miniature radiofrequency (RF) coil; clinical whole-body scanner; small animal; mouse

Funding

  1. French Ministry of Research
  2. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Commissariat a I'Energie Atomique (CEA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The performance of a 12-mm high-temperature superconducting (HTS) surface coil for in vivo microimaging of mice in a standard 1.5T clinical whole-body scanner was investigated. Systematic evaluation of MR image quality was conducted on saline phantoms with various conductivities to derive the sensitivity improvement brought by the HTS coil compared with a similar room-temperature copper coil. The observed signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was correlated to the loaded quality factor of the radio frequency (RF) coils and is theoretically validated with respect to the noise contribution of the MR acquisition channel. The expected in vivo SNR gain was then extrapolated for different anatomical sites by monitoring the quality factor in situ during animal imaging experiments. Typical SNR gains of 9.8, 9.8, 5.4, and 11.6 were found for brain, knee, back, and subcutaneous implanted tumors, respectively, over a series of mice. Excellent in vivo image quality was demonstrated in 16 min with native voxels down to (59 mu m)(3) with an SNR of 20. The HTS coil technology opens the way, for the first time at the current field strength of clinical MR scanners, to spatial resolutions below 10(-3) mm(3) in living mice, which until now were only accessible to specialized high-field MR microscopes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available