4.5 Article

Multiecho Water-Fat Separation and Simultaneous R2* Estimation With Multifrequency Fat Spectrum Modeling

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 60, Issue 5, Pages 1122-1134

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21737

Keywords

water-fat separation; R-2* measurement; T-2* measurement; fat spectrum; fat quantification; fat spectral peak

Funding

  1. NIBIB NIH HHS [RC1 EB010384, RC1 EB010384-02, RC1 EB010384-01] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK083380, R01 DK083380-02, R01 DK083380-01A1] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multiecho chemical shift-based water-fat separation methods are seeing increasing clinical use due to their ability to estimate and correct for field inhomogeneities. Previous chemical shift-based water-fat separation methods used a relatively simple signal model that assumes both water and fat have a single resonant frequency. However, it is well known that fat has several spectral peaks. This inaccuracy in the signal m del results in two undesired effects. First, water and fat are incompletely separated. Second, methods designed to estimate T-2(*) in the presence of fat incorrectly estimate the T-2(*) decay in tissues containing fat. In this work, a more accurate multifrequency model of fat is included in the iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL) water-fat separation and simultaneous T-2(*) estimation techniques. The fat spectrum can be assumed to be constant in all subjects and measured a priori using MR spectroscopy. Alternatively, the fat spectrum can be estimated directly from the data using novel spectrum self-calibration algorithms. The improvement in water-fat separation and T-2(*) estimation is demonstrated in a variety of in vivo applications, including knee, ankle, spine, breast, and abdominal scans. Magn Reson Med 60:1122-1134, 2008. (C) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available