4.4 Article

Non-Gaussian water diffusion kurtosis imaging of prostate cancer

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages 421-427

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2014.01.015

Keywords

Magnetic resonance imaging; Diffusion; Kurtosis; Non-Gaussian; Prostate cancer

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2012CB932600]
  2. Medical Engineering Cross Research Foundation of Shanghai Jiao Tong University [YG2013MS37]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To evaluate the non-Gaussian water diffusion properties of prostate cancer (PCa) and determine the diagnostic performance of diffusion kurtosis (DK) imaging for distinguishing PCa from benign tissues within the peripheral zone (PZ), and assessing tumor lesions with different Gleason scores. Materials and Methods: Nineteen patients who underwent diffusion weighted (DW) magnetic resonance imaging using multiple b-values and were pathologically confirmed with PCa were enrolled in this study. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was derived using a monoexponential model, while diffusion coefficient (D) and kurtosis (K) were determined using a DK model. Differences between the ADC, D and K values of benign PZ and PCa, as well as those of tumor lesions with Gleason scores of 6, 7 and >= 8 were assessed. Correlations between parameters D and K in PCa were analyzed using Pearson's correlation coefficient. ADC, D and K values were correlated with Gleason scores of 6, 7 and >= 8, respectively. Results: ADC and D values were significantly (p < 0.001) lower in PCa (0.79 +/- 0.14 mu m(2)/ms and 1.56 +/- 0.23 mu m(2)/ms, respectively) compared to benign PZ (1.23 +/- 0.19 mu m(2)/ms and 2.54 +/- 0.24 mu m(2)/ms, respectively). K values were significantly (p < 0.001) greater in PCa (0.96 +/- 0.20) compared to benign PZ (0.59 +/- 0.08). D and K showed fewer overlapping values between benign PZ and PCa compared to ADC. There was a strong negative correlation between D and K values in PCa (Pearson correlation coefficient r = -0.729; p < 0.001). ADC and K values differed significantly in tumor lesions with Gleason scores of 6, 7 and >= 8 (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively), although no significant difference was detected for D values (p = 0.325). Significant correlations were found between the ADC value and Gleason score (r = -0.828; p < 0.001), as well as the K value and Gleason score (r = 0.729; p < 0.001). Conclusion: DK model may add value in PCa detection and diagnosis. K potentially offers a new metric for assessment of PCa. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available