4.4 Article

A linear algorithm of the reference region model for DCE-MRI is robust and relaxes requirements for temporal resolution

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages 497-507

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.10.008

Keywords

Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI; Permeability; Reference region model; Pharmacokinetics; Linear models; Gd-DTPA

Funding

  1. University of Arizona Cancer Center
  2. National Cancer Institute [P50 CA95060, PO1 CA017094]
  3. US Army Medical Research and Materiel Command [W81XWH-09-1-0053]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) has utility for improving clinical diagnoses of solid tumors, and for evaluating the early responses of anti-angiogenic chemotherapies. The Reference Region Model (RRM) can improve the clinical implementation of DCE-MRI by substituting the contrast enhancement of muscle for the Arterial Input Function that is used in traditional DCE-MRI methodologies. The RRM is typically fitted to experimental results with a non-linear least squares algorithm. This report demonstrates that this algorithm produces inaccurate and imprecise results when DCE-MRI results have low SNR or slow temporal resolution. To overcome this limitation, a linear least-squares algorithm has been derived for the Reference Region Model. This new algorithm improves accuracy and precision of fitting the Reference Region Model to DCE-MRI results, especially for voxel-wise analyses. This linear algorithm is insensitive to injection speeds, and has 300- to 8000-fold faster calculation speed relative to the non-linear algorithm. The linear algorithm produces more accurate results for over a wider range of permeabilities and blood volumes of tumor vasculature. This new algorithm, termed the Linear Reference Region Model, has strong potential to improve clinical DCE-MRI evaluations. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available