4.4 Review

Sexual dimorphism in the human brain: evidence from neuroimaging

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages 366-375

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.06.007

Keywords

Sex differences; Neuroimaging; Human brain; Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); Positron emission tomography (PET)

Funding

  1. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (AvH)
  2. Society in Science, The Branco Weiss Fellowship
  3. ETH Zurich
  4. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), Germany [FKZ: 01EO1001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years, more and more emphasis has been placed on the investigation of sex differences in the human brain. Noninvasive neuroimaging techniques represent an essential tool in the effort to better understand the effects of sex on both brain structure and function. In this review, we provide a comprehensive summary of the findings that were collected in human neuroimaging studies in vivo thus far: we explore sexual dimorphism in the human brain at the level of (1) brain structure, in both gray and white matter, observed by voxel-based morphometry (VBM) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), respectively; (2) baseline neural activity, studied using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) and positron emission tomography (PET); (3) neurochemistry, visualized by means of neuroreceptor ligand PET; and (4) task-related neural activation, investigated using fMRI. Functional MRI findings from the literature are complemented by our own meta-analysis of fMRI studies on sex-specific differences in human emotional processing. Specifically, we used activation likelihood estimation (ALE) to provide a quantitative approach to mapping the consistency of neural networks involved in emotional processing across studies. The presented evidence for sex-specific differences in neural structure and function highlights the importance of modeling sex as a contributing factor in the analysis of brain-related data. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available