4.4 Article

Anterior cingulate and cerebellar GABA and Glu correlations measured by H-1 J-difference spectroscopy

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages 19-24

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2010.07.005

Keywords

Gamma-aminobutyric acid; GABA; Glutamate; Anterior cingulated; Cerebellar vermis; J-Difference; MRS; Metabolite correlations

Funding

  1. NIH [5T32 EB001628, EB0000461]
  2. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [P41RR002584] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL IMAGING AND BIOENGINEERING [T32EB001628, R01EB000461] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glutamate (Glu) levels, normalized to total creatine (tCr), were measured in the anterior cingulate and cerebellar vermis in healthy adults (n=19, age=24.6+/-6.4 years) using H-1 MRS at 3 T, and metabolite correlations across regions and subjects were determined. Mean anterior cingulate and cerebellar GABA/tCr ratios were 0.31 (0.08) and 0.23 (0.06), respectively, while corresponding Glu levels were 1.16 (0.10) and 0.70 (0.07), respectively. Anterior cingulate and cerebellar glutamate levels were correlated (r=0.6103, P=.0140), although it is noted that when adjusted for multiple comparisons, all correlations reported here cluster to a P value of .0583. It is unlikely that this correlation is driven by correlations in tCr, since interregional correlations were not observed for other metabolites referenced to tCr. Correlations were also observed among metabolites in both the anterior cingulate and cerebellar vermis. In the former, N-acetylasparate was linearly dependent on glutamate (r=0.6577, P=.0063) and, at or below this significance threshold, four metabolites were correlated in the cerebellar vermis (Ins/tCh: r=0.6261, P=.0109. NAA/tCh: r=0.6426, P=.0082. NAA/Glu: r=0.6412, P=.0085. tCh/Glu: r=0.6193, P=0.0122). (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available