4.4 Article

Effects of water exchange on MRI-based determination of relative blood volume using an inversion-prepared gradient echo sequence and a blood pool contrast medium

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 360-369

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2008.07.005

Keywords

Water exchange; Prostate; Relative blood volume; Neoplasm

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A prostate tumor model in rats was used to compare histometric parameters of prostate cancer physiology with those obtained by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The study was focused on vascular physiology as reflected by relative blood Volume nu(b). Histometry and MRI showed a significant increase in mean nu(b) in tumor compared to normal prostate tissue (histometry: normal tissue nu(b)=0.69 +/- 0.19%, tumor tissue nu(b)=1.10 +/- 0.31%, P<001; MRI: normal tissue nu(b)=0.67 +/- 0.23%, tumor tissue nu(b)=1.77 +/- 0.67%, P<.001). The experimental work showed that MRI yielded a 60.9 +/- 0.76% higher nu(b) than histometry in tumors, while no significant difference in nu(b) was found between both methods in normal prostate tissue. Water exchange is known to affect signal intensity on contrast-enhanced MRI. This article investigated the influence of water exchange between intravascular and extravascular space to account for the discrepancy in the values of nu(b) obtained with a dynamic inversion-prepared gradient echo MRI sequence and histometry in tumor and normal prostate tissue. The expected influence of water exchange on nu(b) was modeled by a computer simulation of the MRI signal and compared with experimental results measured with MRI and histometry. The simulation was based on a two-compartment model indicating that nu(b) may be overestimated by MRI. The magnitude of overestimation leads from 10% for the slow water exchange regime to 70% for fast water exchange. Since slow water exchange is probably predominant and even if the observed histological differences in tumor tissue are considered, an overestimation of only 15% due to water exchange is predicted by the simulation. Therefore the overestimation of tumor blood volume by MRI of 60.9% compared to histometry seems to be attributable to additional causes besides water exchange. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available