4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Biexponential analysis of diffusion-related signal decay in normal human cortical and deep gray matter

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Volume 26, Issue 7, Pages 897-904

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2008.01.042

Keywords

high-b diffusion imaging; biexponential signal decay; cortical bray matter; deep gray matter; line scan diffusion imaging; FLAIR

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [U41 RR019703] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIBIB NIH HHS [R01 EB006867, R01 EB006867-06] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS39335, R01 NS039335] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Diffusion imaging with high-b factors, high spatial resolution and cerebrospinal fluid signal suppression was performed in order to characterize the biexponential nature of the diffusion-related signal decay with b-factor in normal cortical gray and deep gray matter (GM). Integration of inversion Pulses with a line scan diffusion imaging sequence resulted in 91% cerebrospinal fluid signal Suppression, permitting accurate measurement of the fast diffusion coefficient in cortical GM (1.142 +/- 0.106 mu m(2)/ms) and revealing a marked similarity with that found in frontal white matter (WM) (1.1 55 +/- 0.046 mu m(2)/ms). The reversal of contrast between GM and WM at low vs high b-factors is shown to be due to it significantly faster slow diffusion coefficient in cortical GM (0.338 +/- 0.027 mu m(2)/ms) than in frontal WM (0.125 +/- 0.014 mu m(2)/ms). The same characteristic diffusion differences between GM and WM are observed in other brain tissue structures. The relative component size showed nonsignificant differences among all tissues investigated. Cellular architecture in GM and WM are fundamentally different and may explain the two- to threefold higher slow diffusion coefficient in Gm. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available