4.4 Article

Non-clinical safety assessment of gadoterate meglumine (Dotarem®) in neonatal and juvenile rats

Journal

REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 73, Issue 3, Pages 960-970

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.09.018

Keywords

Gadolinium-based contrast agent; Gadolinium; Contrast agents; Safety; Juvenile toxicity

Funding

  1. Guerbet

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study was to assess the safety of gadoterate meglumine, a gadolinium-based contrast agent used in magnetic resonance imaging, in neonatal and juvenile rats. Rats received a single intravenous administration on postnatal day (PND) 10 or 6 administrations (from PND 10 to 30), at doses of 0, 0.6, 1.25, and 2.5 mmol/kg/administration, i.e. equivalent to approximately 1, 2 and 4-times the usual human dose. The animals were sacrificed at the end of the treatment period or after a 60-day treatment-free period. No mortality and no significant treatment-related effect on clinical signs, macroscopic and histopathological findings, development, behavior, sexual maturation and hematology parameters were observed. Minor non-adverse changes were observed in clinical biochemistry and urinary parameters. Based on AUC(0-t), gadoterate meglumine was more rapidly eliminated at PND 30 vs. PND 10, reflecting maturation of kidney function. At the end of the treatment period, Gd was measurable in all organs sampled after single or repeated dosing and levels were dose-dependent as expected, the highest ones being found in kidneys. The total Gd concentrations were similar in all the organs following a single or repeated dosing. At the end of the treatment-free period, only traces of gadolinium were quantifiable, almost exclusively in kidneys, reflecting the excretory function of this organ. In conclusion, single or repeated administration of gadoterate meglumine to juvenile rats was well tolerated. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available