4.7 Article

Real-Time Structure Changes during Uniaxial Stretching of Poly (ω-pentadecalactone) by in Situ Synchrotron WAXD/SAXS Techniques

Journal

MACROMOLECULES
Volume 44, Issue 10, Pages 3874-3883

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ma102949h

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [DMR-0906512]
  2. NSF-I/UCRC for Biocatalysis and Bioprocessing of Macromolecules at NYU/Polytechnic University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Poly(omega-pentadecalactone) (PPDL), a model polymer in the poly(omega-hydroxyl fatty acids) family, is a new biopolymer with monomer synthesized by yeast-catalyzed omega-hydroxylation of fatty acids. In this study, deformation-induced structural changes in two PPDL samples with different molecular weights were studied by in situ wide-angle X-ray diffraction (WAXD) and small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) techniques. The high molecular weight PPDL (PPDL-high) sample exhibited notable strain hardening, while the low molecular weight PPDL (PPDL-low) sample did not. The behavior can be explained by the entanglement density concept. The evolution of crystallinity (from WAXD) as a function of strain could be divided into four distinct regions, but their respective mechanisms differ slightly in each sample. During stretching, a mesomorphic phase formed in both samples, bridging between the amorphous and strain-induced crystal phases. The SAXS data verified the effect of molecular weight (or the entanglement density) on the deformation-induced structure of PPDL. The parameters of chain orientation factor (f) calculated from the orthorhombic crystal cell as well as the nonorthorhombic crystal cell proposed by Wilchinsky were used to follow the orientation process during stretching of PPDLs. It was found that the different molecular entanglement network (i.e., PPDL-low versus PPDL-high) led to different crystal orientation behavior, especially in the low strain range.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available