4.7 Article

Structure and Morphology in Highly Oriented Films of Poly(9,9-bis(n-octyl)fluorene-2,7-diyl) and Poly(9,9-bis(2-ethylhexyl)fluorene-2,7-diyl) Grown on Friction Transferred Poly(tetrafluoroethylene)

Journal

MACROMOLECULES
Volume 42, Issue 21, Pages 8298-8306

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ma901623s

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. French Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study focuses on the epitaxial orientation of two polyfluorenes (PF) namely poly(9,9-bis(n-octyl)fluorene-2,7-diyl) (PFO) and poly(9,9-bis(2-ethylhexyl)fluorene-2,7-diyl) (PFO) and poly(9,9-bis-ethylhexyl)fluorene-2,7-diyl) (PF2/6) on friction transferred poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (PF2/6) films with a single-crystal like orientation are obtained on PTFE substrates after proper annealing whereas only marginal orientation is observed for PFO films. For both polymers, the crystalline lemellae grow essentially perpendicular to the PTFE chain direction and the epitaxial conditions were determined as [001](PF)//[001](PTFE) and (010)(PF)//(100)(PTFE). For PF2/6 samples with different molecular weight distributions, the lamellar thickness tends to increase with increasing average patterns corresponding to the [010](PF26) zone supports a 21(4) helical conformation of the PF2/6 chains. A simple structural model based on a trigonal cell with P3 space group, a = b = 1.68 nm and c = 16.9 nm containing a triplet of 21(4) helices accounts well for the main features of the observed electron diffraction pattern. The three 21(4) helices of the triplet show periodic short contacts every fifth monomer along the helix axis, suggesting that the supramolecular assembly of the PF2/6 chains forming the triplet is stabilized by efficient pi-stacking between fluorene monomers. The observed difference in orientation of PF2/6 and PFO on PTFE substrates supports an orientation mechanism involving the PTFE macrosteps.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available