4.3 Article

N-acetylcysteine for therapy-resistant tobacco use disorder: a pilot study

Journal

REDOX REPORT
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages 215-222

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1179/1351000215Y.0000000004

Keywords

N-Acetylcysteine; Smoking cessation; Depression; Oxidative stress; Inflammation; Glutathione

Funding

  1. Health Sciences Postgraduate Program at Londrina State University, Parana, Brazil (UEL)
  2. Phloracea Pharmaceutics, Londrina, Parana, Brazil

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) may have efficacy in treating tobacco use disorder (TUD) by reducing craving and smoking reward. This study examines whether treatment with NAC may have a clinical efficacy in the treatment of TUD. Methods: A 12-week double blind randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare the clinical efficacy of NAC 3 g/day versus placebo. We recruited 34 outpatients with therapy resistant TUD concurrently treated with smoking-focused group behavioral therapy. Participants had assessments of daily cigarette use (primary outcome), exhaled carbon monoxide (COEXH) (secondary outcome), and quit rates as defined by COEXH<6 ppm. Depression was measured with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS). Data were analyzed using conventional and modified intention-to-treat endpoint analyses. Results: NAC treatment significantly reduced the daily number of cigarettes used (Delta mean +/- SD = -10.9 +/- 7.9 in the NAC-treated versus -3.2 +/- 6.1 in the placebo group) and COEXH (Delta mean +/- SD = -10.4 +/- 8.6 ppm in the NAC-treated versus -1.5 +/- 4.5 ppm in the placebo group); 47.1% of those treated with NAC versus 21.4% of placebo-treated patients were able to quit smoking as defined by COEXH<6 ppm. NAC treatment significantly reduced the HDRS score in patients with tobacco use disorder. Conclusions: These data show that treatment with NAC may have a clinical efficacy in TUD. NAC combined with appropriate psychotherapy appears to be an efficient treatment option for TUD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available