4.7 Article

FePO4-coated Li[Li0.2Ni0.13Co0.13Mn0.54]O2 with improved cycling performance as cathode material for Li-ion batteries

Journal

RARE METALS
Volume 36, Issue 11, Pages 899-904

Publisher

NONFERROUS METALS SOC CHINA
DOI: 10.1007/s12598-015-0647-6

Keywords

Lithium-ion battery; Cathode material; Coating; Lithium-rich; Iron phosphate

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [51302017]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2012AA110102]
  3. Science and Technology Commission of Beijing [Z121100006712002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Li[Li0.2Ni0.13Co0.13Mn0.54]O-2 cathode materials were synthesized by carbonate-based co-precipitation method, and then, its surface was coated by thin layers of FePO4. The prepared samples were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM), energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The XRD and TEM results suggest that both the pristine and the coated materials have a hexagonal layered structure, and the FePO4 coating layer does not make any major change in the crystal structure. The FePO4-coated sample exhibits both improved initial discharge capacity and columbic efficiency compared to the pristine one. More significantly, the FePO4 coating layer has a much positive influence on the cycling performance. The FePO4-coated sample exhibits capacity retention of 82 % after 100 cycles at 0.5 A degrees C between 2.0 and 4.8 V, while only 28 % for the pristine one at the same charge-discharge condition. The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) results indicate that this improved cycling performance could be ascribed to the presence of FePO4 on the surface of Li[Li0.2Ni0.13Co0.13Mn0.54]O-2 particle, which helps to protect the cathode from chemical attacks by HF and thus suppresses the large increase in charge transfer resistance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available