4.4 Article

A New Generation of Furanic Copolyesters with Enhanced Degradability: Poly(ethylene 2,5-furandicarboxylate)-co-poly(lactic acid) Copolyesters

Journal

MACROMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
Volume 215, Issue 22, Pages 2175-2184

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/macp.201400175

Keywords

degradable; 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid; polyesters; poly(lactic acid); renewable resources

Funding

  1. FCT/MCTES [BI/UI89/5419/2011, SFRH/BPD/73383/2010]
  2. PNRC of FCT [PTDC/EQU-EPR/114354/2009, PTDC/QUI-QUI/101058/2008, PEst-C/CTM/LA0011/2013, FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-037271]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/EQU-EPR/114354/2009, PTDC/QUI-QUI/101058/2008] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

2,5-Furandicarboxylic acid is a promising renewable-based monomer essentially used in polymer synthesis to prepare renewable-based counterparts to petrochemical polyesters. In general, they are entirely based on renewable resources and have a myriad of very interesting thermal and mechanical properties; however, this study is the first to tackle their (bio) degradability, a worldwide-demanded property. To address this demand, an entirely new generation of furandicarboxylate-derived copolyesters, based on both poly(ethylene 2,5-furandicarboxylate) (PEF) and poly(lactic acid) (PLA), is developed for the first time. These copolyesters are characterized by several techniques, including attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform IR (ATR-FTIR), H-1, and C-13 NMR spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), DSC, and X-ray diffraction (XRD), and their degradability behavior is evaluated by water-absorption studies and hydrolytic degradation. They are essentially stiff amorphous polymers possessing high T(g)s, e.g., ca. 69 degrees C for 29% of lactyl units. Importantly, the data show also that they have improved degradability when compared with the PEF homopolyester counterpart.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available