4.5 Article

Antitumor effects of a monoclonal antibody to human CCR9 in leukemia cell xenografts

Journal

MABS
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages 1000-1012

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.4161/mabs.29063

Keywords

human acute T lymphoblastic leukemia; xenograft; therapeutic antibody; chemokine receptor; targeted cancer therapy; complement-mediated cytotoxicity; cell-mediated cytotoxicity

Funding

  1. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [PI10/00594]
  2. CSIC [200920I016, 201120E007]
  3. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tumor expression of certain chemokine receptors is associated with resistance to apoptosis, migration, invasiveness and metastasis. Because CCR9 chemokine receptor expression is very restricted in healthy tissue, whereas it is present in tumors of distinct origins including leukemias, melanomas, prostate and ovary carcinomas, it can be considered a suitable candidate for target-directed therapy. Here, we report the generation and characterization of 91R, a mouse anti-human CCR9 IgG2b monoclonal antibody that recognizes an epitope within the CCR9 N-terminal domain. This antibody inhibits the growth of subcutaneous xenografts from human acute T lymphoblastic leukemia MOLT-4 cells in immunodeficient Rag2-/-mice. Tumor size in 91R-treated mice was reduced by 85% compared with isotype-matched antibody-treated controls. Tumor reduction in 91R-treated mice was concomitant with an increase in the apoptotic cell fraction and tumor necrotic areas, as well as a decrease in the fraction of proliferating cells and in tumor vascularization. In the presence of complement or murine natural killer cells, 91R promoted in vitro lysis of MOLT-4 leukemia cells, indicating that this antibody might eliminate tumor cells via complement-and cell-dependent cytotoxicity. The results show the potential of the 91R monoclonal antibody as a therapeutic agent for treatment of CCR9-expressing tumors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available