4.5 Article

Improving biophysical properties of a bispecific antibody scaffold to aid developability Quality by molecular design

Journal

MABS
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages 646-654

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.4161/mabs.25632

Keywords

bispecific antibody; heterodimeric antibody; Fc engineering; antibody engineering; biophysical characterization of antibody; antibody stability; LC-MS of antibody; quality by design

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. National Research Council Canada
  3. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  4. Province of Saskatchewan
  5. Western Economic Diversification Canada
  6. University of Saskatchewan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While the concept of Quality-by-Design is addressed at the upstream and downstream process development stages, we questioned whether there are advantages to addressing the issues of biologics quality early in the design of the molecule based on fundamental biophysical characterization, and thereby reduce complexities in the product development stages. Although limited number of bispecific therapeutics are in clinic, these developments have been plagued with difficulty in producing materials of sufficient quality and quantity for both preclinical and clinical studies. The engineered heterodimeric Fc is an industry-wide favorite scaffold for the design of bispecific protein therapeutics because of its structural, and potentially pharmacokinetic, similarity to the natural antibody. Development of molecules based on this concept, however, is challenged by the presence of potential homodimer contamination and stability loss relative to the natural Fc. We engineered a heterodimeric Fc with high heterodimeric specificity that also retains natural Fc-like biophysical properties, and demonstrate here that use of engineered Fc domains that mirror the natural system translates into an efficient and robust upstream stable cell line selection process as a first step toward a more developable therapeutic.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available