4.7 Article

Advantages of sous-vide cooked red cabbage: Structural, nutritional and sensory aspects

Journal

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 56, Issue 2, Pages 451-460

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2013.12.027

Keywords

Firmness; Color; Response surface methodology; Sensory analyses; Anthocyanins

Funding

  1. Generalitat Valenciana under FPI (Researcher Formation Program) grant
  2. Juan de la Cierva programme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The comparison between equivalent cooking treatments should be applied in a systematic way. This study proposes a methodical way to provide cooked samples with similar firmness using two cooking treatments. In addition, the structural, nutritional and sensory properties of red cabbage cooked with sous-vide treatment in comparison with traditional cooking (boiling water) was evaluated. Changes in texture, color and anthocyanin content were measured in samples cooked with traditional cooking (for different times) and sous-vide (modifying time and temperature according to a Response Surface Methodology). Consumers described sensory properties and preferences between samples. Cryo-scanning electron microscopy was used to study the samples microstructure. The firmness of samples, traditionally cooked for 11 min and preferred by consumers, was achieved in samples cooked with sous-vide treatment by optimizing of the cooking conditions (87 degrees C/50 min or 91 degrees C/30 min). Sous-vide treatment was preferred to traditional cooking by consumers. Sous-vide samples were more purple, more aromatic and tastier than traditionally cooked ones. The loss of anthocyanins in traditional cooking was twice that in sous-vide samples. Micrographs from different treatments showed different degrees of cell wall damage. Sous-vide treatment could be recommended as a treatment for the catering industry providing better quality products. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available