4.3 Review

Current advances in lupus genetic and genomic studies in Asia

Journal

LUPUS
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages 1374-1383

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0961203310376639

Keywords

Asian; genetics; genomics; systemic lupus erythematosus

Categories

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2007CB947900]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) [2007AA02Z123]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30700734]
  4. Shanghai Commission of Science and Technology [06JC14050, 07ZR14130, 08JC1414700]
  5. Program of Shanghai Subject Chief Scientist [07XD14021]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The genetic components in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have long been established, however, it has been unclear for many years whether the same genetic risk factors for SLE are shared across different ethnic groups. Over the past few years, a number of genetic and genomic studies have been conducted in Asian populations to address this question. These studies have demonstrated that genetic heterogeneity does exist in SLE across different ethnic groups. With these studies, it has been established that a number of genes associated with SLE in Caucasians are also risk factors in Asians: HLA class II genes, STAT4, BANK1, BLK, IRF5, TNFSF4, ITGAM, etc., while there are also novel genetic risk factors identified by these studies in Asians, for instance, the ETS1 and WDFY4 in Chinese. For the genomic studies, the interferon signature has been confirmed as a major lupus molecular phenotype in Asians the same as in Caucasians; microRNA expression profiling and its novel role in regulating the interferon pathway has been first revealed in Asians. Further understanding of the function of lupus disease genes and delineating the key molecular pathway(s) will enhance the development of novel therapeutic targets and biomarkers for individualized clinical management for lupus patients. Lupus (2010) 19, 1374-1383.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available