4.3 Article

Longitudinal expression of type I interferon responsive genes in systemic lupus erythematosus

Journal

LUPUS
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages 980-989

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0961203309105529

Keywords

gene expression; longitudinal analysis; systemic lupus erythematosus; type I interferon

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [AR 43727]
  2. Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine General Clinical Research Center [MOI-RR00052]
  3. National Institute of Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases [N01-AR-1-2256]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cross-sectional studies of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have demonstrated an association between activation of type I interferon (IFN) pathway and disease activity. This study examined longitudinal changes in IFN-regulated gene expression in peripheral blood using microarrays. A cross-section of 66 patients from the Autoimmune Biomarkers Collaborative Network SLE archive was evaluated. We also examined paired samples from a 15 patient subset collected during a period of low disease activity ( Baseline) and at a subsequent flare event, and baseline scores of 29 patients who maintained low disease activity. IFN response (IFNr) scores were calculated from three IFN-regulated genes. Overall, higher IFNr scores were associated with increased disease activity. However, IFNr scores were not significantly different between the paired Baseline and Flare samples. An extended longitudinal analysis in 11 patients indicated little change in IFNr scores over time, even during dynamic disease activity. In patients with low disease activity, IFNr scores were not different between patients who experienced a subsequent flare and those who maintained low disease activity. In summary, although higher IFNr scores were associated with greater disease activity, IFNr scores of individual patients did not correlate with changes in disease severity or flare risk. Lupus (2009) 18, 980-989.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available