4.5 Review

Genetic alterations defining NSCLC subtypes and their therapeutic implications

Journal

LUNG CANCER
Volume 82, Issue 2, Pages 179-189

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.07.025

Keywords

Adenocarcinoma; Squamous cell carcinoma; Histological subtypes; CNA; Methylation; Sequencing; Actionable alterations; Personalized medicine

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes for Health Research [MOP 86731, MOP 94867, MOP-110949]
  2. Canadian Cancer Society [CCS20485]
  3. U.S. Department of Defense [CDMRP W81XWH-10-1-0634]
  4. NCI Early Detection Research Network
  5. Canary Foundation
  6. Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide, accounting for more deaths than breast, prostate and colon cancer combined. While treatment decisions are determined primarily by stage, therapeutically non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has traditionally been treated as a single disease. However, recent findings have led to the recognition of histology and molecular subtypes as important determinants in treatment selection. Identifying the genetic differences that define these molecular and histological subtypes has the potential to impact treatment and as such is currently the focus of much research. Microarray and genomic sequencing efforts have provided unparalleled insight into the genomes of lung cancer subtypes, specifically adenocarcinoma (AC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC), revealing subtype specific genomic alterations and molecular subtypes as well as differences in cell signaling pathways. In this review, we discuss the recurrent genomic alterations characteristic of AC and SqCC (including molecular subtypes), their therapeutic implications and emerging clinical practices aimed at tailoring treatments based on a tumor's molecular alterations with the hope of improving patient response and survival. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available