4.5 Article

Phase II study of sunitinib as maintenance therapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

Journal

LUNG CANCER
Volume 74, Issue 3, Pages 474-480

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.05.004

Keywords

Sunitinib; Carboplatin; Paclitaxel; Non-small cell lung cancer; Maintenance; Phase II

Funding

  1. Pfizer Inc.
  2. Pfizer
  3. Amgen Inc.
  4. Cephalon Inc.
  5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals
  6. Thar Pharmaceuticals
  7. Monogram Biosciences
  8. Oncogene Science

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This open-label, phase II study evaluated the antitumor activity and safety of sunitinib monotherapy as maintenance treatment following first-line chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Following treatment with standard doublet chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin), patients received oral sunitinib (starting dose 50 mg/day) in 6-week cycles (Schedule 4/2: 4 weeks on treatment, 2 weeks off treatment) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was probability of survival at 1 year >= 55%. Of 84 patients who received first-line chemotherapy, 66 (79%) received sunitinib maintenance therapy (median sunitinib cycles started: 2 [range 1-20]). Probability of survival at 1 year was 40.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 29.8, 51.0). Median overall survival was 10.4 months (95% CI: 8.0, 12.2). The objective response rate was 27.4% (95% CI: 18.2, 38.2). The most frequently reported all-causality adverse events of any grade during sunitinib maintenance therapy were fatigue/asthenia (55%), diarrhea (36%), and nausea (32%). These data suggest that maintenance therapy may have value in NSCLC, although the primary endpoint of the study was not met. (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available