Journal
LUNG CANCER
Volume 59, Issue 1, Pages 88-94Publisher
ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.07.025
Keywords
NSCLC; oestrogen receptor alpha; oestrogen receptor beta; immunohistochemistry; prognosis; gender
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background: Adenocarcinoma of the Lung is more frequent in females than in mates and the association with smoking is less pronounced than for the other histological subtypes of lung cancer. Oestrogen induction of cell proliferation has been found in breast adenocarcinomas, and since oestrogen receptors (ER) have been demonstrated in lung tumours, a similar role of oestrogens in the development of lung cancer has been suggested. We examined the expression of ER alpha, ER beta and progesterone in a well defined cohort of patients with NSCLC with more than 15 years of follow up, and related the results to gender and survival. Methods: Paraffin embedded, histological material was collected from 104 patients (71 men and 33 women), operated in the period 1989-1992 for NSCLC (56 squamous cell carcinomas, 40 adenocarcinomas and 8 large cell carcinomas). ER alpha, ER beta and progesterone were immunohistochemically analysed. Staining frequency and intensity was scored semi-quantitatively. A tumour was defined as positive when more than 10% of the tumour cells were positive with at least a weak nuclear staining. Kaptan-Meier survival curves were generated to evaluate the significance of ER alpha, ER beta and progesterone expression for the prognosis. Results: ER beta positivity was demonstrated in 69% (72 of 104) of the tumours. There was no statistically significant correlation between ERP positivity and age, gender, stage, or histology. After adjusting for gender, age, stage at diagnosis and histology there was no difference in survival between subjects with ERP positive and ERP negative tumours. When stratifying by gender women with ERP-negative tumours had a non-significant (P=0.26) decrease in mortality compared with women with ER beta positive tumours. In contrast, men with ERP positive tumours had a significantly reduced mortality (P=0.035) compared to men with ER beta negative tumours. Using multivariate regression analysis the interaction between gender and positive ER beta staining was the only significant prognostic factor. There was no correlation between the ER alpha immunohistochemical staining and any of the clinical variables, including survival. None of the 104 patients had tumours positive for progesterone. Conclusion: The presence of ERP in a tumour seems to be a positive prognostic factor for men with non-small cell lung cancer. The finding confirms another resent study and suggests that the relation between oestrogens and lung cancer be investigated further. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available