4.5 Article

Muscle Mass Predicts Outcomes Following Liver Transplantation

Journal

LIVER TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 19, Issue 11, Pages 1172-1180

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/lt.23724

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [R01 DK066266, NOT-OD-09-056N]
  2. National Center for Research Resources of the National Institutes of Health
  3. National Institutes of Health Roadmap for Medical Research [5UL1 RR024153-04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For patients with end-stage liver disease, commonly used indices of nutritional status (ie, body weight and body mass index) are often inflated because of fluid overload (ie, ascites and peripheral edema), and this results in an underdiagnosis of malnutrition. Because muscle is the largest protein reservoir in the body, an estimate of the muscle mass may be a more reliable and valid estimate of nutritional status. Therefore, we used pretransplant computed tomography data for 338 liver transplantation (LT) candidates to identify muscle and fat mass on the basis of a specific abdominal transverse section commonly used in body composition analyses, and we investigated the contribution of this measure to specific post-LT outcomes. We found that the majority of our patients (68%) could be defined as cachectic. For men, muscle mass predicted many important posttransplant outcomes, including intensive care unit (ICU) stay, total length of stay (LOS), and days of intubation. Muscle mass was a significant predictor of survival and also predicted disposition to home versus another facility. For women, muscle mass predicted ICU stay, total LOS, and days of intubation, but the effect was modest. Muscle mass did not predict survival or disposition for women. In conclusion, because pretransplant muscle mass is associated with many important postoperative outcomes, we discuss these findings in the context of possible pretransplant interventions for either improving or sustaining muscle mass before surgery. Liver Transpl 19:1172-1180, 2013. (c) 2013 AASLD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available