4.7 Article

Metabolomic tissue signature in human non-alcoholic fatty liver disease identifies protective candidate metabolites

Journal

LIVER INTERNATIONAL
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages 207-214

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/liv.12476

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. German Ministry of Education and Research (BmBF) through the Virtual Liver project
  2. Swiss National Funds [310030_138747/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundNon-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common chronic liver disorder in industrialized countries, yet its pathophysiology is incompletely understood. Small-molecule metabolite screens may offer new insights into disease mechanisms and reveal new treatment targets. MethodsDiscovery (N=33) and replication (N=66) of liver biopsies spanning the range from normal liver histology to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) were ascertained ensuring rapid freezing under 30s in patients. 252 metabolites were assessed using GC/MS. Replicated metabolites were evaluated in a murine high-fat diet model of NAFLD. ResultsIn a two-stage metabolic screening, hydroquinone (HQ, p(combined)=3.0x10(-4)) and nicotinic acid (NA, p(combined)=3.9x10(-9)) were inversely correlated with histological NAFLD severity. A murine high-fat diet model of NAFLD demonstrated a protective effect of these two substances against NAFLD: Supplementation with 1% HQ reduced only liver steatosis, whereas 0.6% NA reduced both liver fat content and serum transaminase levels and induced a complex regulatory network of genes linked to NALFD pathogenesis in a global expression pathway analysis. Human nutritional intake of NA equivalent was also consistent with a protective effect of NA against NASH progression. ConclusionThis first small-molecular screen of human liver tissue identified two replicated protective metabolites. Either the use of NA or targeting its regulatory pathways might be explored to treat or prevent human NAFLD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available