4.7 Article

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts mortality in patients listed for liver transplantation

Journal

LIVER INTERNATIONAL
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages 502-509

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/liv.12688

Keywords

inflammation; liver transplantation; mortality; neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background & AimsIn the absence of overt infection, the systemic inflammatory response is increasingly recognised as a pathogenetic factor in the circulatory dysfunction of advanced cirrhosis. Our aim was to determine whether the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, a marker of systemic inflammation, is predictive of mortality in patients with end-stage cirrhosis listed for liver transplantation. MethodsA single centre study of 570 patients listed for first elective single-organ liver transplantation January 2007-June 2011. ResultsThe median listing neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio was 2.9 (IQR 1.9-4.7). Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio demonstrated a positive correlation with listing serum bilirubin (P<0.001), negative correlation with serum sodium (P<0.001), and positive correlation with the MELD score (P<0.001). Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio increased with increasing severity of ascites (P<0.001). A higher neutrophil count (P<0.001) and lower lymphocyte count (P=0.001) were predictors of wait-list death. In a multivariate competing risk Cox model, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio remained independently associated with mortality (HR 1.10; 95% CI 1.05-1.15, P<0.001). The proportion of patients with a neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio <2, 2-4.9, and 5 who had died by 3months of listing was 3%, 13.8% and 37.3% respectively (P<0.001). After adjusting for MELD, increasing increments of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio were predictive of death by 3months (P=0.043). ConclusionsThe blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, a simple and readily available marker of systemic inflammation, is an independent predictor of mortality in patients with liver failure listed for liver transplantation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available