4.7 Article

Determination of ethyl glucuronide in hair improves evaluation of long-term alcohol abstention in liver transplant candidates

Journal

LIVER INTERNATIONAL
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages 469-476

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/liv.12243

Keywords

alcoholic liver disease; cirrhosis; hair ethyl glucuronide; liver transplantation; urine ethyl glucuronide

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background & AimsPrior to listing patients for Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) an abstention period of 6months is required. Ethyl glucuronide in the hair is a new reliable marker for the assessment of alcohol consumption. Here, the diagnostic value of determining the ethyl glucuronide concentration in the hair of liver transplant candidates was evaluated. MethodsIn 63 transplant candidates with alcoholic liver cirrhosis and 25 control patients with cirrhosis of other aetiologies alcohol markers, i.e. hEtG, urine EtG, blood ethanol, methanol and carbohydrate deficient transferrin were determined in parallel to an interview with a psychologist. ResultsA total of 19 (30%) transplant candidates admitted alcohol consumption within the last 6months, while 39/63 (62%) were positive for at least one alcohol marker. In 52% of the 44 candidates denying alcohol consumption, abstention was disproved by detecting at least one positive alcohol marker, in 83% of cases by a positive hEtG result. In the control patients stating abstention from alcohol all hEtG tests were negative. No impact of renal or liver function on hEtG results was detected. A specificity of 98% and a positive predictive value of 92% were calculated for testing hEtG in proximal hair segment and applying a cut-off of 30pg/mg. ConclusionsIn 52% of patients denying alcohol consumption within the last 6 months, alcohol abstention was disproved, in 83% of cases by hEtG testing. Therefore, hEtG is a promising new marker for the evaluation of long-term alcohol abstention in liver transplant candidates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available