4.7 Article

Clinical efficacy and failure pattern in patients with cervical esophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy

Journal

RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
Volume 116, Issue 2, Pages 257-261

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.07.011

Keywords

Failure pattern; Prognosis; Cervical esophageal cancer; Chemoradiotherapy; Prognostic factor

Funding

  1. Sci-Tech Project Foundation of Guangdong Province [2012B031800287]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Data on cervical esophageal cancer (CEC) based on modern radiotherapy technique are rare. We aimed to analyze the clinical efficacy and failure pattern of patients with CEC who underwent definitive chemoradiotherapy. Methods: Between February 2002 and October 2013, 102 patients with CEC treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy with conformal radiotherapy (50-70 Gy in 25-35 fractions, 5 fractions per week over 5-7 weeks). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and loco-regional failure-free survival (LRFFS) were calculated. Results: The 3-year OS, PFS and LRFFS rates for the entire sample were 39.3%, 33.6% and 35.3%, respectively. During follow-up, 32, 26, and 41 patients had developed local, regional, and distant failure, respectively. Sex and hoarseness were independent prognostic indicators for OS (P = 0.011, P<0.001; respectively) and PFS (P = 0.008, P = 0.001; respectively). Hoarseness was the only independent prognostic factor for LRFFS (P = 0.002). Conclusions: Distant metastasis was the most common failure pattern in CEC patients undergoing definitive chemoradiotherapy. Hoarseness was an independent prognostic factor for OS, PFS, and LRFFS. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available