4.7 Article

Cyclosporine A inhibits in vitro replication of betaretrovirus associated with primary biliary cirrhosis

Journal

LIVER INTERNATIONAL
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages 871-877

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2010.02257.x

Keywords

betaretrovirus; cyclosporine A; liver transplantation; primary biliary cirrhosis; recurrent disease; tacrolimus

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes for Health Research
  2. Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research
  3. Canadian Liver Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/Aim Up to one-third of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) experience recurrent disease following liver transplantation, which is associated with earlier and more severe recurrence in patients treated with tacrolimus as compared with cyclosporine A (CsA). As the latter has known antiviral activity, we hypothesized that CsA has the ability to inhibit the betaretrovirus characterized from patients with PBC. Methods We investigated whether CsA, the cyclosporine analogue NIM811, tacrolimus and other compounds can modulate the mouse mammary tumour virus production from Mm5MT cells. Viral load was evaluated in the cell supernatants by quantifying reverse transcriptase (RT) levels and betaretrovirus RNA. Results A significant correlation was observed with increasing concentrations of CsA and NIM811, and decreasing of RT levels (-0.59, P=0.04 and -0.74, P=0.006 respectively), whereas tacrolimus had no significant effect (-0.27, P=0.4). At a dose of 3 mu g/ml, CsA, NIM811 and the human immunodeficiency virus aspartyl protease inhibitor, lopinavir, were all associated with greater than three-fold reduction in the betaretrovirus RNA production from Mm5MT cells as compared with tacrolimus (P < 0.005). Conclusions These studies demonstrate that the cyclophilin inhibitors CsA and NIM811 have antiviral activity against betaretrovirus production in vitro.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available