Journal
LIVER INTERNATIONAL
Volume 28, Issue 10, Pages 1352-1362Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2008.01789.x
Keywords
blood test; diagnostic accuracy; liver biopsy; liver fibrosis; Metavir staging; non-invasive diagnosis; reliable diagnosis; sensitivity; specificity; viral hepatitis C
Categories
Funding
- French Department of Health
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background: The reliable diagnosis rate of diagnostic tests is provided by their intervals with acceptable accuracy (e.g. >= 90%) where a liver biopsy can be avoided. Aims: To evaluate the overall accuracy and improve the reliable diagnosis rates of blood tests for significant liver fibrosis. Methods: Five blood tests were compared with Metavir fibrosis (F) staging in 1056 patients with chronic hepatitis C. Results: Area under the receiver operating characteristics (F0-1 vs. F2-4) were: FibroMeter: 0.853, Fibrotest: 0.811, Fib-4: 0.799, aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI): 0.786 and Hepascore: 0.784 (P < 10(-3) between tests). The reliable diagnosis rates based on two traditional intervals defined by thresholds >= 90% of negative predictive values (NPV) and positive predictive values (PPV), diagnosing F0/1 and F2/3/4, respectively, were: FibroMeter: 43.5%, APRI: 19.6%, Fibrotest: 17.1%, Hepascore: 3.9%, Fib-4: 1.7% (P < 10(-3)). By dividing the indeterminate interval by the diagnostic cut-off, two new intervals could be diagnosed reliably: F1/2 and F1/2/3. Accordingly, the reliable diagnosis rate was increased, e.g. FibroMeter: 75.5% (accuracy: 89.5%) with three intervals (F0/1, F1/2, F2/3/4). It was possible to further increase this rate by using the more exportable 90% sensitivity/specificity thresholds, e.g. FibroMeter: 90.2% (accuracy: 86.4%). By using the four intervals, the reliable diagnosis rate was 100% (accuracy: 89.5% with predictive value (PV) and 87.5% with sensitivity/specificity). Conclusion: Reliable diagnosis is a diagnostic index devoted to clinical practice. Its rate can be increased by creating new intervals between diagnostic cut-off and 90% PVs or sensitivity/specificity thresholds. This increased the overall accuracy from 78.1 to 89.5% and reduced the need for a liver biopsy from 56.5 to 0% with the most accurate test.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available