4.7 Article

Blood Flow Vortices along the Main Pulmonary Artery Measured with MR Imaging for Diagnosis of Pulmonary Hypertension

Journal

RADIOLOGY
Volume 275, Issue 1, Pages 71-79

Publisher

RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMERICA
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14140849

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. GlaxoSmithKline
  2. Pfizer
  3. Boehringer Ingelheim
  4. Astra Zeneca
  5. Nycomed Takeda
  6. Bayer
  7. Chiesi
  8. Ludwig Boltzmann Society
  9. Actelion
  10. Gilead
  11. GSK
  12. Lilly
  13. Novartis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To approximate the functional relationship between invasively measured mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) and the phase-contrast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-derived duration of vortical blood flow along the main pulmonary artery and to analyze its applicability for noninvasive diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension (PH) and borderline mPAP. Materials and Methods: The local ethics review board approved this prospective study of 145 patients suspected of having PH (69 patients with PH, 19 patients with borderline mPAP, and 57 patients with normal mPAP) who underwent right heart catheterization (RHC) and three-directional phase-contrast MR imaging of the main pulmonary artery. Velocity fields were viewed with dedicated software and evaluated for the duration of vortical blood flow in the main pulmonary artery (t(vortex), the percentage of cardiac phases with vortex present). The relationship between mPAP at RHC and t(vortex) was assessed by means of a segmented linear regression model, and by Bland-Altman and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses. Results: The relationship between mPAP and tvortex was described adequately (R-2 = 0.95) as linearly increasing, from t(vortex) of 0% (mPAP <= 16.0 mm Hg) with a slope of 1.59% per millimeter of mercury. The standard deviation between mPAP values derived from RHC and those estimated by using t(vortex) was 3.9 mm Hg. The area under the curve for t(vortex)-based diagnosis of PH was 0.994 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.982, 0.998), and the calculated PH cut-off value (t(vortex) >= 14.3%) resulted in sensitivity of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.90, 0.99) and specificity of 0.96 (95% CI: 0.89, 0.99). Vortical blood flow with t(vortex) less than 14.3% was specific for borderline mPAP. Conclusion: Duration of vortical blood flow in the main pulmonary artery that is determined by using phase-contrast MR imaging allows accurate estimation of elevated mPAP and diagnosis of PH. (C) RSNA, 2014

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available