4.2 Article

The Phospholipidomic Signatures of Human Blood Microparticles, Platelets and Platelet-Derived Microparticles: a Comparative HILIC-ESI-MS Investigation

Journal

LIPIDS
Volume 50, Issue 1, Pages 71-84

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1007/s11745-014-3975-7

Keywords

Phospholipid analysis; Mass spectrometry; High performance liquid chromatography; Mammalian lipid biochemistry

Funding

  1. Italian Ministero per l'Istruzione, l'Universita e la Ricerca (MIUR) [PRIN 2009KW27KE_003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The phospholipidomic signatures of human blood microparticles and platelets, evaluated by hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry, were compared. The phospholipidome of platelet-derived microparticles, obtained by platelets stimulation with a mixture of Ca(II), thrombin and collagen, was also considered for the comparison. Platelets, blood microparticles and platelet-derived microparticles displayed qualitatively similar phospholipidomes, all based on eight major phospholipid classes, namely: phosphatidylcholines, diacyl- and plasme(a)nyl-phosphatidylethanolamines, phosphatidylserines, phosphatidylinositols, sphingomyelins and lyso forms of phosphatidylcholines and phosphatidylethanolamines. However, while the phospholipidomes of platelets and platelet-derived microparticles were found to be generally similar also from a quantitative point of view, a higher relative incidence of species bearing polyunsaturated side chains, especially in phospholipid classes sharing the choline head (i.e. phosphatidylcholines and lyso-phosphatidylcholines), was observed in the case of blood microparticles. As a further peculiar feature, never reported before, the relative abundance of lyso-phosphatidylcholines among the eight identified phospholipid classes was found to be significantly higher in the lipid extracts of blood microparticles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available