4.2 Article

Long-chain Ceramide Produced in Response to N-Hexanoylsphingosine does not Induce Apoptosis in CHP-100 Cells

Journal

LIPIDS
Volume 44, Issue 11, Pages 1039-1046

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11745-009-3350-2

Keywords

Ceramide; N-Hexanoylsphingosine; Salvage pathway; Apoptosis; Neuroepithelioma cells

Funding

  1. MIUR (Ministero dell'Istruzione dell'Universita e della Ricerca)
  2. Angelo Spinedi

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It has been previously reported that treatment of CHP-100 human neuroepithelioma cells with N-hexanoylsphingosine (C6-Cer) induces intracellular accumulation of long-chain ceramide (LC-Cer) and apoptosis. Herein, we investigated the existence of any causal relationship between the two phenomena. We report that C6-Cer-evoked LC-Cer accumulation is potently attenuated by the ceramide synthase inhibitor fumonisin B1; however, fumonisin B1 neither affects the apoptotic response evoked by C6-Cer administration, nor is toxic by itself to CHP-100 cells. Different to fumonisin B1, the serine-palmitoyltransferase inhibitor l-cycloserine does not attenuate C6-Cer-evoked LC-Cer accumulation, thus suggesting that LC-Cer is produced via the sphingosine salvage pathway. Consistently, CHP-100 cells accumulate LC-Cer in response to sphingosine administration; however, their viability is not affected. The above-reported results indicate that, in the cell system investigated, C6-Cer, but not LC-Cer, is involved in apoptosis induction. As this finding is discussed in the light of the evidence that C6-Cer-induced apoptosis associates with cytochrome c release into the cytosol and caspase-9 activation, thus calling for an involvement of the mitochondrial pathway, it also lends support to the notion that caution must be exercised when investigating the biological effects of endogenous ceramide by use of exogenously administered short-chain analogues.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available