4.6 Article

The role of contrast enhanced computed tomography in the diagnosis of necrotizing fasciitis and comparison with the laboratory risk indicator for necrotizing fasciitis (LRINEC)

Journal

RADIOLOGIA MEDICA
Volume 121, Issue 2, Pages 106-121

Publisher

SPRINGER-VERLAG ITALIA SRL
DOI: 10.1007/s11547-015-0575-4

Keywords

Necrotizing fasciitis; LRINEC score; Soft tissue infections; Computed tomography; Musculoskeletal infections

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) in emergency departments for diagnosis of necrotizing fasciitis (NF) and for differential diagnosis of other musculoskeletal infections; to correlate radiological findings with the laboratory risk indicator for necrotizing fasciitis (LRINEC). 7 radiological parameters to be analysed on CECT scans were established, exams of 36 patients with proven diagnosis of NF (n 12) and other musculoskeletal infections (n 24) were retrospectively reviewed; LRINEC score was calculated. Fisher's test and Spearman's and Kendall's coefficients of rank correlations were performed. Two parameters were found to be strongly associated with the diagnosis of NF: involvement of the fascia (Spearman's rho of 0.888, p < 0.001) and lack of fascial enhancement (Spearman's rho of 0.672, p < 0.001). LRINEC score did not show strong association with the presence of fasciitis NF (Spearman's rho of 0.490, p = 0.0024). Computed tomography (CT) parameters, which are significantly associated with the diagnosis of NF, are the involvement of the fascia and its lack of enhancement; LRINEC score could be high (> 5) also in other musculoskeletal infections. Final diagnosis of necrosis among the fascia is surgical. Presence of gas is not a specific sign of necrotizing fasciitis being present in other musculoskeletal infections. CT could easily discriminate NF from other musculoskeletal infections, adds an important value to clinical and laboratory tests in diagnosis of NF in an emergency context when magnetic resonance imaging, which is superior to CT in this discernment, could not be performed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available