4.7 Article

Riluzole-induced block of voltage-gated Na+ current and activation of BKCa channels in cultured differentiated human skeletal muscle cells

Journal

LIFE SCIENCES
Volume 82, Issue 1-2, Pages 11-20

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2007.10.015

Keywords

riluzole; voltage-gated Na+ current; Ca2+-activated K+ current; large-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channel; human skeletal muscle cell

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Riluzole is known to be of therapeutic use in the management of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. In this study, we investigated the effects of riluzole on ion currents in cultured differentiated human skeletal muscle cells (dHSkMCs). Western blotting revealed the protein expression of alpha-subunits for both large-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ (BKCa) channel and Na+ channel (Na(v)1.5) in these cells. Riluzole could reduce the frequency of spontaneous beating in dHSkMCs. In whole-cell configuration, riluzole suppressed voltage-gated Na+ current (I-Na) in a concentration-dependent manner with an IC50 value of 2.3 mu M. Riluzole (10 mu M) also effectively increased Ca2+-activated K+ current (I-K(Ca) which could be reversed by iberiotoxin (200 nM) and paxilline (1 mu M), but not by aparnin (200 nM). In inside-out patches, when applied to the inside of the cell membrane, riluzole (10 mu M) increased BKCa-channel activity with a decrease in mean closed time. Simulation studies also unraveled that both decreased conductance of I-Na and increased conductance of I-K(Ca) utilized to mimic riluzole actions in skeletal muscle cells could combine to decrease the amplitude of action potentials and increase the repolarization of action potentials. Taken together, inhibition of I-Na and stimulation of BKCa-channel activity caused by this drug are partly, if not entirely, responsible for its muscle relaxant actions in clinical setting. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available