4.7 Article

FAS-antisense 1 lncRNA and production of soluble versus membrane Fas in B-cell lymphoma

Journal

LEUKEMIA
Volume 28, Issue 12, Pages 2376-2387

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2014.126

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI/NIH [CA158692]
  2. NIDDK [DK091490]
  3. LLS [R6187-09]
  4. ACS [MSRG-10-052-01-LIB]
  5. Richard Spencer Lewis Memorial Foundation and patients' families
  6. Cancer Center Support Grant from the NCI [P30C16672]
  7. University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center [CA16672]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Impaired Fas-mediated apoptosis is associated with poor clinical outcomes and cancer chemoresistance. Soluble Fas receptor (sFas), produced by skipping of exon 6, inhibits apoptosis by sequestering Fas ligand. Serum sFas is associated with poor prognosis of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. We found that the alternative splicing of Fas in lymphomas is tightly regulated by a long-noncoding RNA corresponding to an antisense transcript of Fas (FAS-AS1). Levels of FAS-AS1 correlate inversely with production of sFas, and FAS-AS1 binding to the RBM5 inhibits RBM5-mediated exon 6 skipping. EZH2, often mutated or overexpressed in lymphomas, hyper-methylates the FAS-AS1 promoter and represses the FAS-AS1 expression. EZH2-mediated repression of FAS-AS1 promoter can be released by DZNeP (3-Deazaneplanocin A) or overcome by ectopic expression of FAS-AS1, both of which increase levels of FAS-AS1 and correspondingly decrease expression of sFas. Treatment with Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor or EZH2 knockdown decreases the levels of EZH2, RBM5 and sFas, thereby enhancing Fas-mediated apoptosis. This is the first report showing functional regulation of Fas repression by its antisense RNA. Our results reveal new therapeutic targets in lymphomas and provide a rationale for the use of EZH2 inhibitors or ibrutinib in combination with chemotherapeutic agents that recruit Fas for effective cell killing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available