4.7 Article

Secondary malignancies after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation in the era of reduced-intensity conditioning; the incidence is not reduced

Journal

LEUKEMIA
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages 829-835

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2012.299

Keywords

stem-cell transplantation; reduced-intensity conditioning; secondary malignancies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Secondary malignancies are well established complication in long-term survivors after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (SCT) with myeloablative conditioning (MAC). Fludarabine-based reduced-intensity (RIC) and reduced-toxicity conditioning (RTC) regimens are increasingly used in the last decade; however, due to limited long-term follow-up, there is no data on secondary malignancies in this setting. The records of 931 consecutive patients given allogeneic SCT with MAC (n = 257), RIC (n = 449) or RTC (n = 225), in a single institution over a 13-year period, were reviewed. Twenty-seven patients had secondary malignancy, diagnosed a median of 43 months (7 months-11.5 years) after SCT. The 10-year cumulative incidence was 5.6% (95% confidence interval (CI), 3.6-8.7), twice the expected rate in matched normal population. The incidence was 1.7, 7.4 and 5.7% after MAC, RIC and RTC, respectively (P = 0.02). Multivariate analysis identified fludarabine-based conditioning (hazard ratio (HR) 3.5, P = 0.05), moderate-severe chronic graft-versus-host disease (HR 2.8, P = 0.01) and diagnosis of chronic myeloproliferative or non-malignant disease (HR 0.2, P = 0.04) as risk-factors for secondary malignancy. The related 10-year mortality rate was 2.4% (95% CI, 1.0-5.4). In conclusion, the risk of secondary malignancies is not reduced and is even possibly increased in the era of fludarabine-based RIC/RTC. Patients and physicians should be aware of this association and life-long cancer screening is required for all transplant survivors. Leukemia (2013) 27, 829-835; doi:10.1038/leu.2012.299

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available