4.7 Article

Use of minimal disseminated disease and immunity to NPM-ALK antigen to stratify ALK-positive ALCL patients with different prognosis

Journal

LEUKEMIA
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages 416-422

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2012.205

Keywords

ALCL; child; MDD; anti-ALK

Funding

  1. Fondazione Citta Della Speranza
  2. Associazione Italiana contro le Leucemie (AIL)
  3. Camera di Commercio di Venezia
  4. Deutsche Jose Carreras Leukamie-Stiftung [DJCLS08/09]
  5. Forschungshilfe peiper
  6. Leukemia and Lymphoma research
  7. Sam Foye Fund
  8. Julian Starmer-Smith Lymphoma fund
  9. National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Center Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We studied the prognostic value of minimal disseminated disease (MDD) and anti-ALK immune response in children with NPM-ALK positive anaplastic-large cell lymphoma (ALCL) and evaluated their potential for risk stratification. NPM-ALK transcripts were analyzed by RT-PCR in bone marrow/peripheral blood of 128 ALCL patients at diagnosis, whereas ALK antibody titers in plasma were assessed using an immunocytochemical approach. MDD was positive in 59% of patients and 96% showed an anti-ALK response. Using MDD and antibody titer results, patients could be divided into three biological risk groups (bRG) with different prognosis: high risk (bHR): MDD-positive and antibody titer <= 1/750, 26/128 (20%); low risk (bLR): MDD negative and antibody titer >1/750, 40/128 (31%); intermediate risk (bIR): all remaining patients, 62/128 (48%). Progression-free survival was 28% (s.e., 9%), 68% (s.e, 6%) and 93% (s.e, 4%) for bHR, bIR and bLR, respectively (P<0.0001). Survival was 71% (s.e., 9%), 83% (s.e, 5%) and 98% (s.e 2%) for bHR, bIR and bLR (P=0.02). Only bHR and histology other than common type were predictive of higher risk of failure (hazard ratio 4.9 and 2.7, respectively) in multivariate analysis. Stratification of ALCL patients based on MDD and anti-ALK titer should be considered in future ALCL trials to optimize treatment. Leukemia (2013) 27, 416-422; doi:10.1038/leu.2012.205

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available