4.7 Article

Clinical significance of CD81 expression by clonal plasma cells in high-risk smoldering and symptomatic multiple myeloma patients

Journal

LEUKEMIA
Volume 26, Issue 8, Pages 1862-1869

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2012.42

Keywords

multiple myeloma; plasma cells; CD81; flow cytometry; phenotype; survival

Funding

  1. Cooperative Research Thematic Network (RTICs) [RD06/0020/0006, RD06/0020/0005, RD06/0020/0031, RD06/0020/0101, RD06/0020/1056, RD06/0020/0041, G03/136]
  2. MM Jevitt
  3. SL firm
  4. Instituto de Salud Carlos III/Subdireccion General de Investigacion Sanitaria [FIS: PI060339, 06/1354, 02/0905, 01/0089/01-02, PS09/01897/01370]
  5. Consejeria de Sanidad, Junta de Castilla y Leon, Valladolid, Spain [557/A/10]
  6. Celgene
  7. Janssen-Cilag

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The presence of CD19 in myelomatous plasma cells (MM-PCs) correlates with adverse prognosis in multiple myeloma (MM). Although CD19 expression is upregulated by CD81, this marker has been poorly investigated and its prognostic value in MM remains unknown. We have analyzed CD81 expression by multiparameter flow cytometry in MM-PCs from 230 MM patients at diagnosis included in the Grupo Espanol de Mieloma (GEM)05 > 65years trial as well as 56 high-risk smoldering MM (SMM). CD81 expression was detected in 45% (103/230) MM patients, and the detection of CD81(+) MM-PC was an independent prognostic factor for progression-free (hazard ratio = 1.9; P = 0.003) and overall survival (hazard ratio = 2.0; P = 0.02); this adverse impact was validated in an additional series of 325 transplant-candidate MM patients included in the GEM05 <65 years trial. Moreover, CD81(+) SMM (n = 34/56, 57%) patients had a shorter time to progression to MM (P = 0.02). Overall, our results show that CD81 may have a relevant role in MM pathogenesis and represent a novel adverse prognostic marker in myeloma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available