4.7 Article

Clinical utility and implications of asparaginase antibodies in acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Journal

LEUKEMIA
Volume 26, Issue 11, Pages 2303-2309

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2012.102

Keywords

ALL; asparaginase; antibody; allergy; pharmacodynamics; osteonecrosis

Funding

  1. Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals
  2. NCI [CA 142665, CA 36401, CA 21765]
  3. NIH/NIGMS Pharmacogenomics Research Network [U01 GM92666]
  4. American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities (ALSAC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hypersensitivity to asparaginase is common, but the differential diagnosis can be challenging and the diagnostic utility of antibody tests is unclear. We studied allergic reactions and serum antibodies to E. coli asparaginase (Elspar) in 410 children treated on St. Jude Total XV protocol for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Of 169 patients (41.2%) with clinical allergy, 147 (87.0%) were positive for anti-Elspar antibody. Of 241 patients without allergy, 89 (36.9%) had detectable antibody. Allergies (P = 0.0002) and antibodies (P = 6.6 x 10(-6)) were higher among patients treated on the low-risk arm than among those treated on the standard/high-risk arm. Among those positive for antibody, the antibody titers were higher in those who developed allergy than in those who did not (P<1 x 10(-15)). Antibody measures at week 7 of continuation therapy had a sensitivity of 87-88% and a specificity of 68-69% for predicting or confirming clinical reactions. The level of antibodies was inversely associated with serum asparaginase activity (P = 7.0 x 10(-6)). High antibody levels were associated with a lower risk of osteonecrosis (odds ratio = 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-0.89; P = 0.007). Antibodies were related to clinical allergy and to low systemic exposure to asparaginase, leading to lower risk of some adverse effects of therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available