4.7 Review

Disparities in the prevalence, pathogenesis and progression of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and multiple myeloma between blacks and whites

Journal

LEUKEMIA
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages 609-614

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2011.368

Keywords

monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance; multiple myeloma; racial disparity; African-American; prevalence; progression

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD [CA107476, CA100707, CA83724]
  2. NIH/NCRR CTSA [TL1 RR024152]
  3. Jabbs Foundation, Birmingham, UK
  4. Henry J Predolin Foundation, USA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is marked racial disparity in the incidence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and multiple myeloma, with a two to threefold increased risk in blacks compared with whites. The increased risk has been seen both in Africans and African Americans. Similarly, an increased risk of monoclonal gammopathies in blacks compared with whites has been noted after adjusting for socioeconomic and other risk factors, suggesting a genetic predisposition. The higher risk of multiple myeloma in blacks is likely a result of the higher prevalence of the premalignant MGUS stage; there are no data to suggest that blacks have a higher progression rate of MGUS to myeloma. Studies are emerging that suggest the baseline cytogenetic characteristics, and progression may differ by race. In contrast, to the increased risk noted in blacks, studies suggest that the risk may be lower in certain racial and ethnic groups, notably persons from Japan and Mexico. We review the literature on racial disparity in the prevalence, pathogenesis and progression of MGUS and multiple myeloma between blacks and whites. We also discuss future directions for research that could inform management of these conditions and positively influence patient outcomes. Leukemia (2012) 26, 609-614; doi:10.1038/leu. 2011.368; published online 23 December 2011

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available