4.7 Article

CpG methylation patterns and decitabine treatment response in acute myeloid leukemia cells and normal hematopoietic precursors

Journal

LEUKEMIA
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages 244-254

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2011.207

Keywords

epigenetics; decitabine; acute myeloid leukemia; myelodysplastic syndrome; differentiation; therapy

Funding

  1. NIH [1R01CA138858, U54HL090513]
  2. Department of Defense [PR081404]
  3. Scott Hamilton CARES Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The DNA hypomethylating drug decitabine maintains normal hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) self-renewal but induces terminal differentiation in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells. The basis for these contrasting cell fates, and for selective CpG hypomethylation by decitabine, is poorly understood. Promoter CpGs, with methylation measured by microarray, were classified by the direction of methylation change with normal myeloid maturation. In AML cells, the methylation pattern at maturation-responsive CpGs suggested at least partial maturation. Consistent with partial maturation, in gene expression analyses, AML cells expressed high levels of the key lineage-specifying factor CEBPA, but relatively low levels of the key late-differentiation driver CEBPE. In methylation analysis by mass spectrometry, CEBPE promoter CpGs that are usually hypomethylated during granulocyte maturation were significantly hypermethylated in AML cells. Decitabine-induced hypomethylation was greatest at these and other promoter CpGs that are usually hypomethylated with myeloid maturation, accompanied by cellular differentiation of AML cells. In contrast, decitabine-treated normal HSCs retained immature morphology, and methylation significantly decreased at CpGs that are less methylated in immature cells. High expression of lineage-specifying factor and aberrant epigenetic repression of some key late-differentiation driver genes distinguishes AML cells from normal HSCs, and could explain the contrasting differentiation and methylation responses to decitabine. Leukemia (2012) 26, 244-254; doi:10.1038/leu.2011.207; published onlin 12 August 2011

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available